🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in other EU countries